Imagine receiving a notification on your phone from a 'Democracy App.' It prompts you to securely log in and review a recent debate in the Parliament about a newly proposed legislation. The platform provides three key video clips: the first presents the ruling party's arguments in favour of the legislation, the second video showcases the main opposition's critique, and the third presents a small group of MPs proposing amendments. After a week of digesting the information, consulting various sources, and discussing with friends and family, you cast your vote securely via the app. Welcome to my vision for Democracy 2.0.
Our current system evolved in an era when literacy was a luxury and information dissemination was slow. Knowledge was not widely accessible, and the electorate had limited choice, often forcing them to make unsatisfactory compromises. Today, you may find yourself torn between the economic policies of one party and the social policies of another. The issue is that once elected, representatives tend to focus on appeasing billionaires rather than serving the interests of their constituents.
In contrast, my proposed system is attuned to our digital age. In the UK, most of the population is literate, educated, and capable of informed decision-making. We live in an era where information travels at the speed of light, making it high time to upgrade our democratic processes.
In this revised system, the roles of MPs remain unchanged - they will form a government, choose a Prime Minister, and debate proposed legislation. However, the ultimate power rests with the citizens, who can accept or reject any legislation through a direct voting system. If you can cast a vote for reality TV shows, why shouldn't you vote on matters that directly impact your life?
A small group of people can be easily manipulated or corrupted, which is an unfortunate reality in our political system. Hence, it is crucial that power is returned to the citizens. Ideally, in a truly free nation, citizens govern themselves. When the power of legislation lies directly in the citizens' hands, accountability is increased, and the chance of a small group enforcing laws against the people's will is greatly reduced.
Direct voting on legislation could foster a national consciousness, encouraging each citizen to take an active interest in legislative affairs. This collective responsibility could extend to self-governance, societal welfare, global issues, and environmental concerns.
Moreover, this system leverages existing technology to distribute power from the elite to ordinary citizens. With wealth increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few and the rise of automation threatening job security, it's time for citizens to assert control. In a world progressively driven by AI, people risk becoming irrelevant without active participation in decision-making processes.
Implementing this vision won't be easy. Mainstream political parties, both left and right wing, are unlikely to readily relinquish power. However, I believe a single-issue party could drive this change, initially funded by philanthropic individuals. This funding could help introduce the concept to younger generations through extensive online marketing, subsequently generating more financial support.